CVE-2026-82672 PUBLISHED

Unvalidated chunk-size line tail in Mint HTTP/1 client enables response smuggling against strict intermediaries on pooled connections

Assigner: EEF
Reserved: 17.09.2026 Published: 19.09.2026 Updated: 19.09.2026

Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') vulnerability in elixir-mint mint allows a malicious HTTP/1 server to desynchronize a strict intermediary and the Mint client on a pooled connection, enabling response-queue poisoning against subsequent requests that share the connection.

Mint.HTTP1.Parse.chunk_size/1 in lib/mint/http1/parse.ex stops at the first non-hexadecimal byte of a chunked response's chunk-size line and returns the remainder unexamined. Mint.HTTP1.decode_body/5 in lib/mint/http1.ex then discards every byte up to the CRLF with Parse.ignore_until_crlf/1, so the accepted grammar is a run of hex digits followed by arbitrary bytes, where RFC 9112 permits only a ;-introduced chunk extension. Lines such as 5ZZZZZ and 5 9 are accepted as chunk size 5, and 0ZZZZ is accepted as the terminating chunk that ends the message body. An RFC-strict intermediary rejects such a line while Mint accepts it, so the two disagree on chunk boundaries and on where the response ends.

This issue affects mint: from 0.1.0 before 1.10.1.

Metrics

CVSS Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CVSS Score: 6.3

Product Status

Vendor elixir-mint
Product mint
Versions Default: unaffected
  • affected from 0.1.0 to 1.10.1 (excl.)
Vendor elixir-mint
Product mint
Versions Default: unaffected
  • affected from 60089586ec7adc9fddb09f69a2f5919ba9ac7f33 to c82377838dc6e275ef40bafa664fbcdf50270c60 (excl.)

Affected Configurations

Exploitation requires a deployment topology in which an RFC-strict HTTP/1 intermediary (proxy, load balancer, or WAF) sits between the Mint client and the attacker-influenced origin, and HTTP/1 connections between the client and the intermediary are reused across requests (keep-alive with connection pooling). Mint clients that talk directly to an origin without an intermediary, or that do not reuse connections, are not exploitable for response-queue poisoning even if the vulnerable parsing behavior is present.

Credits

  • Eurico Nicacio finder
  • Eurico Nicacio reporter
  • Eric Meadows-Jönsson remediation developer
  • Andrea Leopardi remediation reviewer

References

Problem Types

  • CWE-444 Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request/Response Smuggling') CWE

Impacts

  • A malicious or attacker-influenced HTTP/1 origin behind an RFC-strict intermediary can make the intermediary and the Mint client disagree on chunk boundaries and on where the response body ends. On a pooled keep-alive connection that disagreement lets bytes from one response be attributed to the next, poisoning the responses returned to unrelated requests that share the connection.