CVE-2026-82752 PUBLISHED

Ash string length constraints count graphemes, so a combining-mark string of any size passes max_length

Assigner: EEF
Reserved: 31.08.2026 Published: 05.09.2026 Updated: 05.09.2026

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in ash-project ash allows an attacker to store a value of arbitrary size in an attribute whose length constraint should bound it.

Ash measures string length with Elixir's String.length/1, which counts Unicode graphemes, in the max_length and min_length constraints of Ash.Type.String (apply_constraints/2 in lib/ash/type/string.ex), in Ash.Resource.Validation.StringLength, and in the string_length expression function. A grapheme carries an unbounded number of combining marks, so a base character followed by a million combining acute accents is one grapheme and megabytes of data, and satisfies max_length: 2. Where the data layer imposes no independent limit (ETS, Mnesia, or a Postgres text column) the whole value is persisted, so an attacker can write an entire request body into an attribute declared with a small maximum and grow storage without bound.

The counting unit also disagrees with the storage layer, which counts codepoints rather than graphemes, so a value accepted by the constraint can still be rejected or truncated by the column. A Postgres varchar(n) column bounds the value itself and is not exposed.

This issue affects ash: from 0.10.0 before 3.33.0.

Metrics

CVSS Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CVSS Score: 5.9

Product Status

Vendor ash-project
Product ash
Versions Default: unaffected
  • affected from 0.10.0 to 3.33.0 (excl.)
Vendor ash-project
Product ash
Versions Default: unaffected
  • affected from 05848d5f4affe60fddd812222a18ada080c0813b to * (excl.)

Affected Configurations

A resource attribute must carry a max_length constraint (or an equivalent string_length validation) fed from client input, and the data layer must impose no independent size limit of its own. The ETS and Mnesia data layers and Postgres text columns store the value in full; a Postgres varchar(n) column bounds it independently and is not exposed.

Credits

  • Jonatan Männchen / EEF finder
  • Jonatan Männchen / EEF reporter
  • Zach Daniel / Ash Project remediation developer
  • Jonatan Männchen / EEF coordinator

References

Problem Types

  • CWE-1284 Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input CWE

Impacts

  • CAPEC-153 Input Data Manipulation